Introduction
In this post, I outline the basics of setting up and using OpenBUGS on linux. BUGS stands for Bayesian inference Using Gibbs Sampling. OpenBUGS allows for the analysis of highly-complex statistical models using Markov-chain Monte Carlo methods. It is specifically focused on Bayesian methods.
This guide may not be generalizable to all Linux systems, but it worked for me. It wasn’t too difficult, but I did have to pull together a number of different sources to get everything working as intended.
Installing OpenBUGS
First of all, I am running Arch linux with kernel version x86_64 Linux 4.14.13-1-ARCH
. I was not able to find any one-step installation package, so I followed the instructions on the OpenBUGS site. The OpenBUGS site instructs the user to do the following:
Download and Unpack the package
tar zxvf OpenBUGS-3.2.3.tar.gz
cd OpenBUGS-3.2.3
Compile and Install
./configure
make
sudo make install
And, if your system has all of the necessary dependencies, that’s it! My system, however, did not have the necessary dependencies – there are some 32-bit C development packages required for installation. I installed the following packages in response to various error messages in the installation process: lib32-glibc, lib32-gcc-libs, gcc6-libs, gcc6
. I’m not certain that all of those are strictly necessary, and I can’t guarantee others won’t be required: read the installation logs/error messages for details. After installing those packages, the rest of the installation went smoothly.
Making OpenBUGS talk to R
I use R daily, so for me, it made sense to set up OpenBUGS to run within my existing R analysis/programming workflow. To that end, we install two packages, R2OpenBUGS
and coda
. I will explain what they do later. As with any other packages, install these in an R session with install.packages(c("R2OpenBUGS","coda"))
"
Example
I will replicate example 2.4 of Bayesian Methods for Data Analysis by Carlin and Louis (Carlin and Louis 2008, 23) using OpenBUGS within R. Note that this textbook uses WinBUGS, which is no longer under active development. Current development focuses on the open-source OpenBUGS, the subject of this guide.
In this example, we consider a normal (Gaussian) likelihood paramaterized by \(\theta\) and \(\sigma^2\) and a normal prior \(\pi(\theta | \eta)\) parameterized by hyperparameters \(\eta = (\mu, \tau)\). Note that, in OpenBUGS, when specifying a normal distribution, we use precision = 1/variance instead of variance or SD as we might use in other settings – keep this in mind as we define our model.
OpenBUGS requires three main components to solve Bayesian modeling programs. We have to define (i) a statistical model; (ii) some data; and (iii) starting values to be used by the Markov-chain Monte Carlo sampling procedure. We follow the methods shown on the R tutorial website.
Loading required packages
As noted earlier, we require a couple of packages to carry out the analysis. They can be loaded as follows:
library("R2OpenBUGS")
library("coda")
library("lattice")
Defining our model
We define our model as an R function. We will never actually call this function, but this format allows the R2OpenBUGS package to properly invoke the OpenBUGS system. Note that the code within the function is taken directly from Carlin and Louis’s book. Note as well that, when defining variables in our model definition, we must use <-
; using an equals sign =
will return an error. The tilde ~
means that a parameter follows a particular distribution.
Per the bugs
(from the R2OpenBUGS package) function help documentation (viewed with ?bugs
), the model has to be saved as a .txt
file. We save it to the /tmp
directory using the write.model
from the the R2OpenBUGS
package.
model=function(){
prec.ybar<-n/sigma2
prec.theta<-1/tau2
ybar~dnorm(theta,prec.ybar)
theta~dnorm(mu, prec.theta)
}
# write the model to a .txt file, save to /tmp
model.file=file.path(tempdir(),"model.txt")
write.model(model,model.file)
Defining our data and parameters of interest
In this case, we only have one data point. We are treating this as a univariate problem, so we supply values for \(\mu\), \(\sigma^2\), and \(\tau^2\). The only parameter we want to perform inference on, in this case, is \(\theta\), so we must indicate this before running our BUGS process as well.
data=list(ybar=6,mu=2,sigma2=1,tau2=1,n=1)
# parameter
params=c("theta")
Defining inital values
For the algorithm to work, we must supply plausible starting values for our parameters of interest. In this case, we are only interested in \(\theta\), so only need to supply a starting value for \(\theta\). As with the model, we also define the inital values as a function. Once again, R will not call this function, but defining it this way allows OpenBUGS to access it.
inits=function() {list(theta=0)}
Inference with BUGS
Now we call the bugs()
function to run OpenBUGS from R. We pass the data, inital values, parameters, and model file as defined above.
out=bugs(data,inits,params,model.file,n.iter=10000)
From this, we can obtain (among other things) the mean and standard deviation of our parameter.
out$mean["theta"]
## $theta
## [1] 3.99604
out$sd["theta"]
## $theta
## [1] 0.7107001
Coda
Recall that, earlier, we installed and loaded the package coda
. This package provides a set of tools for summarizing and visualizing results from Markov-chain Monte Carlo simulation experiments. It also has a suite of diagnostic tools, but we will not be focusing on those capabilities in this post. We will use the coda
package to plot our distribution.
To use coda, we need to make a slight adjustment to our call to bugs
– we need to add codaPkg=TRUE
to the function call. Once that is done, we can easily see the density of our distribution.
out=bugs(data,inits,params,model.file,codaPkg=TRUE, n.iter=10000)
coda.out=read.bugs(out)
## Abstracting deviance ... 5000 valid values
## Abstracting theta ... 5000 valid values
## Abstracting deviance ... 5000 valid values
## Abstracting theta ... 5000 valid values
## Abstracting deviance ... 5000 valid values
## Abstracting theta ... 5000 valid values
densityplot(coda.out)
What we see resembles a normal density with a mean around 4. This makes sense given that the prior mean was 2 and the data sample mean was 6, and the variances of the two were the same.
Conclusion
This was a quick guide to get up and running with OpenBUGS and R on a Linux system. In future posts, we’ll delve into some more of the nuts and bolts of how to use OpenBUGS and how to interpret the results in light of general Bayesian data analysis principles and practices.
Carlin, Bradley P., and Thomas A. Louis. 2008. Bayesian Methods for Data Analysis, Third Edition. CRC Press.